The main points that I got from the
webcast was that technology is not being used to its potential in this country. Current education is limited; the focus is “looking
good” through test scores. We are
focusing on the wrong things. Just
because a country’s education looks good on paper with high test scores, that
does not mean there are entrepreneurs like Steve Jobs. Even though Asian Americans are achieving
academically, doesn’t mean they are
achieving in the workplace. America’s education
isn’t getting worse; it’s never gotten better.
Even Albert Einstein said, “It is a miracle that curiosity survives
formal education.”
I thought that Zhao made some very
good points and agreed with his arguments.
I actually explored Zhao’s
website; he had a list of conclusions, one of them that worded my conclusion of
the argument made was this one, “To cultivate creative and entrepreneurial
talents is much more than adding an entrepreneurship course or program to the curriculum.
It requires a paradigm shift—from employee-oriented education to
entrepreneur-oriented education, from prescribing children’s education to
supporting their learning, and from reducing human diversity to a few
employable skills to enhancing individual talents.”
When I think to previous readings
this semester, several chime in with Zhao’s argument. “Children (and adults) learn best when
engaged in complex, socially constructed, personally relevant, creative
composition and interpretation of texts that incorporate a variety of
meaningful communicative modes or symbol systems (Sanders).” This came from Weekly Reading Three. Personally relevant learning is most
important. Beating a country’s test
score is not a personally relevant goal.
It is important that teachers don’t
just “use it to say they used it.”
Effective, powerful, and meaningful writing is the ultimate goal. “Knobel
and Lankshear(2006, p. 91) suggest that for effective powerful writing to take
place using blogs, the focus should be on ‘genuine affinity spaces’ that will
interest and challenge students into writing effective pieces for significant
purposes (Adlington 2008).”
Digital texts are not as linear as
printed texts. They open up the creative mind.
"...the reading path of printed texts is well established, and
although you can certainly move around a text, the trajectory is linear. With
digital texts, however, the reading path is “to-be-constructed” by the reader
(or by the image or nature of the multimodal text; Kress, 2003). When reading
online, you do not know where you will end up at the end of the reading event
(Roswell 2009)."
Zhao mentions that we need to be
supporters not prescribers of our learners.
Students need authentic education.
"As our relationship with the technical world evolves, it is our
responsibility as educators to find authentic ways to shape learning that
encompasses this form of digital literacy because reading and writing is at the
center of this practice (Carey).”
We need to teach according to the
child’s culture, not the world’s culture.
"This analysis has shown how children introduce themselves through
their writing, how they signal identity in their online communication and how
they act as bricoleurs, borrowing discursive fragments from popular culture
(GUY)."
If you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will go on its
whole life believing that it is stupid.
Reference:
Adlington, R.,
& Hansford, D. (2008, July 6). Digital spaces and young people’s online
authoring: Challenges for teachers. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from National
Conference for Teachers of English and Literacy: http://www.englishliteracyconference.com.au/files/documents/AdlingtonHansford-Digital%20spaces.pdf
Carey, J. (n.d.).
Instant Messaging: A Literacy Event. Retrieved June 30, 2013,
from Google Docs: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6DFAmexYq7vYWdXV2RacF9EVXc/edit
GUY MERCHANT
(2004) Imagine All that Stuff Really Happening: narrative and identity in
children's on-screen writing, E-Learning and Digital Media, 1(3),
341-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/elea.2004.1.3.2
Rowsell, J.,
& Burke, A. (2009, October). Reading by Design: Two Case Studies of Digital
Reading Practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(2),
pp. 106-118. doi:10.1598/JAAL.53.2.2
Sanders, Jennifer
and Albers, Peggy. Multimodal Literacies: An Introduction. Retrieved from
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:ZnRBedCgj_IJ:https://secure.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Books/Sample/32142Intro_x.pdf+are+literacies+and+Discourses+used+interchanably&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjE9pBd2JmN_g_xuDVosAj01ImYkr6u-oyjriG0tREXG8fzwbyeuhcmDw0rrbTA1rug-bgizHwuiUlocJcQwdvcCiPOxZYWVExNgQ8BmulksyeRUcUX4LJmfxLlw7e8UTdG2TuT&sig=AHIEtbSZ7RHTNL_Rfe2bglUQRg9zzCD2JA